ckirknielsen’s avatarckirknielsen’s Twitter Archive—№ 1,292

  1. …in reply to @tabatkins
    tabatkins isVisible might be less confusing regarding its all-encompassing-ness. My gut tells me visibility: visible is a lot less used than visibility: hidden or the [hidden] attribute. Intuitively I would assume isHidden only checks for [hidden], not opacity/visibility/inert.
    On twitter.com ↗ ckirknielsen’s avatar 2022 Jun 1 Mood -2 🙁
    1. …in reply to @ckirknielsen
      tabatkins (on the flip-side, inert returning true for hidden/invisible feels like sight-based naming might be slightly inappropriate since you can see it, just not in the accessibility tree? But I cannot think of a good alternative at this time)
      Permalink On twitter.com ↗ ckirknielsen’s avatar 2022 Jun 1 Mood +5 🙂